Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Posco India Delhi Steel Processing ... vs Union Of India & on 17 October, 2013

Bench: M.R. Shah, Sonia Gokani

  
	 
	 POSCO INDIA DELHI STEEL PROCESSING CENTRE PVT LTD....Petitioner(s)V/SUNION OF INDIA
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/SCA/11097/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CIVIL
APPLICATION  NO. 11097 of 2013
 

===========================================================
 


POSCO INDIA DELHI STEEL
PROCESSING CENTRE PVT LTD....Petitioner(s)
 


Versus
 


UNION OF INDIA  & 
2....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MRHARDIKPMODH,
ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
 

MR
RJ OZA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2 - 3
 

NOTICE
SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE MS
				JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 17/10/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)

1. This petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner has prayed for appropriate writ, order and/or direction directing respondent No.1.(1) To implement the order dated 11.2.2013 passed by the Hon ble High Court in Tax Appeal Nos. 1 to 5 of 2013. (2) To grant refund of SAD mentioned in the letter dated 28.5.2013.

It appears that against the order dated on 11th February, 2013 passed by this Court in Tax Appeal Nos. 1 to 5 of 2013, department has approached before Hon ble Supreme Court and Hon ble Supreme Court has granted leave in Special Leave to Appeal and interim order has been passed. Therefore, as such parties are governed by interim order passed by Hon ble Supreme Court with respect to refund scheme arising out in Tax Appeal Nos. 1 to 5 of 2013 and therefore, no further order has been passed by this Court .

Now, so far as other eight refund applications mentioned in Paragraph 8 of the communication dated 28th May, 2013 is concerned, Mr.R.J.Oza, ld. counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 has stated at bar that eight pending refund applications shall be processed by the Department in accordance with law, in light of the observation made by Hon ble Supreme Court in its order dated 27th September, 2013 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 25595-25599/2013 and an appropriate order shall be passed in accordance with law at the earliest, not later than 3 months from today.

In view of above statement made by Shri R.J.Oza, ld.counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 recorded hereinabove, the present Special Civil Application is disposed by directing respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to act as stated hereinabove and finally decide and dispose of eight pending refund applications mentioned in the communication dated 28.5.2013 (other than refund applications which are subject matter before the Hon ble Supreme Court), in accordance with law and in light of the observations made by Hon ble Supreme Court in its order dated 27th September, 2013 passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos. 25595-25599/2013 and at the earliest however not later than 3 months from today.

5. With this present Special Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.

(M.R.SHAH, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) bina Page 3 of 3