Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Dulsinh vs State on 11 November, 2011

Author: Md Shah

Bench: Md Shah

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/1690/2008	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1690 of 2008
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

DULSINH
DABHSINH PARMAR - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
YS JOSHI for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
Mr L R Pujari, Addl.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent(s) :
1, 
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE MD SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 26/08/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER 

Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned APP for the State.

RULE.

Learned APP waives service of Rule for the respondent-State.

The petitioner-original accused No.3 was convicted by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra in Sessions Case No.160 of 2002 for the offences punishable under sections 143, 148, 436 and 302 of IPC. The present petitioner has not filed appeal against the aforesaid judgment and order before the High Court. Without approaching the competent authority, straightway, this application has been preferred by the present petitioner before this court for granting parole leave. Mother of the petitioner expired on 14.8.2008. The petitioner is directed to prefer application for parole leave before the competent authority and if such an application is moved by the petitioner, it will be decided by the competent authority as early as possible, preferably within one week from the date of filing of the application. This application is disposed of accordingly. Rule is discharged. D.S. is permitted.

[M.D. SHAH, J.] msp     Top