Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Samsul Hoque vs The Union Of India And 7 Ors on 10 February, 2021

Author: Manish Choudhury

Bench: Manish Choudhury

                                                                          Page No. 1/2

GAHC010143142019




                        THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                            Case No. : WP(C)/4316/2019

         SAMSUL HOQUE
         S/O. LT. IMAN ALI, VILL. SIDHANI, P.O. SITOLI, P.S. BAGHBOR, DIST.
         BARPETA, PIN-781308.

         VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS.
         REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, DEPTT. OF HOME, NEW
         DELHI-01.

         2:THE STATE OF ASSAM
          REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM
          DEPTT. OF HOME
          DISPUR
          GUWAHATI-06.

         3:THE ELECTION COMMISSION
         ASSAM
          HOUSEFED
          GUWAHATI-06.

         4:THE DY. COMMISSION
          BARPETA-781301.

         5:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE (B)
          BARPETA
          PIN-781301.

         6:THE ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER
          BARPETA
          PIN-781301.

         7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE (B)
          BAGBOR
                                                                                    Page No. 2/2

             DIST. BARPETA
             PIN-781308.

            8:THE FOREIGNERS TRIBUNAL
             BARPETA
             PIN-781301
             REP. BY THE STANDING COUNSEL
             GUWAHATI HIGH COURT-01

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. A ROSHID

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.


                                    BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY

                                             ORDER

Date : 10.02.2021 Heard Mr. A. Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Adhikari, learned Additional Central Government Counsel for the respondent no. 1.

None has appeared for the other respondents today on call, whereas by order dated 20.11.2019, learned Standing Counsel, FT had sought time to obtain further instruction and to furnish the fresh case number of the proceeding, if any, after the repeal of the IMDT Act as the petitioner has been marked as 'D' Voter.

List the matter after 2 (two) weeks.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant