Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Kamal Sharma & Ors vs M/S Blue Coast Infrastructure ... on 3 October, 2018

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018 DEL 2862

Author: Manmohan

Bench: Manmohan

                                                                   #9, 12, 13
$~
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+      CS(OS) 176/2015

       KAMAL SHARMA & ORS                     ..... Plaintiffs
                  Through               Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate
                                        with Mr. Aquib Ali, Advocates

                               versus

       M/S BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE
       DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants
                    Through  Mr. Rushil Deshpande, Advocate
                             for D-1.

                                        Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate
                                        with Mr. Naman Joshi, Mr.
                                        Pranvir Sethi, Ms. Avshreya P.S.
                                        Rudy and Mr. Abhishek Chhabra,
                                        Advocates for D-2.

                                        Mr. Ankur Chawla with Mr.
                                        Sangram Singh, Ms. Megha Gupta
                                        and
                                        Mr. Mohit Gupta, Advocates for
                                        D-3

                                        Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Mr.
                                        Vishal Bhardwaj and Mr.
                                        Abhishek Chabra, Advocates for
                                        D-5 to D-8.

                                        Mr. Manu Nair with Mr. Tanuj
                                        Bhushan and Mr. Manik
                                        Sachdeva, Advocates for D-
                                        9/DIAL.


CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018                  Page 1 of 15
                                           Dr. Sarbjit Sharma with Ms. Leeza
                                          Taneja, Advocates for D-147 to
                                          149.

                                          Mr. Amanjeet Singh, Advocate for
                                          IFCI.

                                          Mr. Dheeraj Gupta, Advocate for
                                          Applicants/Mr. Pradeep Jaiswal,
                                          Mr. Amit Garg and Mr. Rahul
                                          Garg.

                                          Mr. Manoj Arora with Mr.
                                          Siddharth Shankar, Advocates for
                                          Applicant/ Investor in IA
                                          24909/2015.

                                          Mr. Nikhil Borwankar with
                                          Mr. Vikram Singh Kushwaha,
                                          Mr. Kaushik Barua, Mr.
                                          Roopensav Pratap Singh and Mr.
                                          David Thomas, Advocates for
                                          Applicant in IA 4194/2017.

                                          Mr. Chetan Lokur with Mr. Tarun
                                          J. Hinjharia, Advocates for
                                          Applicant in IA 13462/2018 and
                                          15031/2017.


                                        WITH

+      CS(OS) 87/2018

       MS. PREETI CHHABRA                       ..... Plaintiff
                     Through              Mr. S.S. Sobti with Ms. Bhumika,
                                          Advocates
                               versus


CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018                    Page 2 of 15
        M/S. BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE
       DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. & ANR       ..... Defendants
                     Through  Mr. Abhishek Chhabra, Advocate
                              for D-1

                                      AND
+      CS(OS) 88/2018

       MS. SURJEET KAUR REKHI             ..... Plaintiff
                     Through  Mr. S.S. Sobti with Ms. Bhumika,
                              Advocates
                     versus

       M/S. BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE
       DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. & ANR       ..... Defendants
                     Through  Mr. Abhishek Chhabra, Advocate
                              for D-1

%                                    Date of Decision: 03rd October, 2018

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

                                 JUDGMENT

MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 1338/2015, I.A. 17272/2015, 17273/2015, 9867/2017, 12556/2018, 13462/2018, 13630-13631/018 in CS (OS) 176/2015 With consent of parties, present applications are allowed. Let an amended memo of parties be filed by the plaintiff within one week.

Accordingly, present applications stand disposed of. CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018, 88/2018 Today parties have handed over a draft consensual order along with schedule of payments to be paid to the creditors of the defendant no. 1, CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 3 of 15 pursuant to directions of this Court dated 20th August, 2018 and 25th September, 2018, which is taken on record. The draft consensual order and List of investors to be re-paid are reproduced hereinbelow:-

"The present matter has been pending before this Hon'ble Court as a representative suit. Without adverting to the merits of the matter, it may be noted that approximately Rs. 80.25 Crores (inclusive of interest) are lying with the Registry of this Hon'ble Court pursuant to a consent order dated 6.11.2017 whereby DIAL/Defendant No. 9 had been ordered to deposit the amounts as per the arbitral award dated 27.06.2017 with this Hon'ble Court instead of paying the same to Defendant No. 2.
Since then, this Hon'ble Court has considered various methods and mechanisms for disbursal of the amount lying with it. After much deliberation, the Defendant Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiffs, and the other investors who were not arrayed as parties before this Hon'ble Court in Kamal Sharma and Ors. Vs. Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. And Ors., CS (OS) 176 of 2015, have arrived at a mechanism to disburse the monies lying with this Hon'ble Court in the manner agreed as per the List dated 1.10.2018 supplied by the defendant no. 1 (appended herewith). The Defendant Nos. 3 - 8 have no objection to the aforesaid.
The disbursal of the monies is being undertaken on a formula without prejudice to the rights and contention of the parties wherein all parties are receiving certain monies in partial satisfaction of their claims whereas the remainder of their claims will remain alive. It may be noted that in cases where there is no settlement agreement, the monies are being received by the investors without prejudice to their eventual claims. However, many of the Plaintiffs as well as parties not arrayed before this Hon'ble Court in Kamal Sharma and Ors. Vs. Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd. And Ors., CS (OS) 176 of 2015 have entered into settlements with the Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 whereby certain sums are payable on a monthly basis to each of them against their settled CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 4 of 15 amounts. All such parties are receiving monies/instalments till 31.3.2019, including any instalments in default as of date. If may be noted that the existing settlements are not being novated or modified in any manner and will remain in force as agreed between the parties.
All parties have agreed to receiving monies in the manner and amount as specified in the List and have no objection to the immediate disbursal of the monies lying with the Registry of this Hon'ble Court. In all cases where there is a settlement agreement, upon passing the order for disbursement of money there shall be no coercive action against the Defendants till 31.3.2019.
It is made clear that this order shall not affect the obligation of the defendants under various settlement agreements whether the same be out of court or pursuant to mediation proceedings before various courts. The Defendants shall discharge their obligations under the settlement agreements after 31.3.2019. Further, in case of default in payments of monthly instalments in terms of settlement agreement, the plaintiffs and other investors shall be at liberty to pursue the case on merit and other legal recourses for the balance amount in terms of settlement agreement after 31.03.2019.
The third class of investors are those who have not entered into any settlement agreements with the Defendant No. 1. The said third class is accepting the money without prejudice to their rights and contentions in terms of their individual agreements with the Defendants or the list annexed hereto. However, the amounts stated as balance due to them in the List shall not be construed as an admission of the total claim amount due and payable to the said class of investors. However, the said third class of investors though their counsels tender their statement that they will not assail the present order or upset the present disbursal mechanism in any manner. The said statement is accepted. The rights and contentions of the said third class and the Defendants are left open. It is clarified that the stay on coercive action till CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 5 of 15 31.3.2019 does not apply in the cases of the parties with whom no settlement agreements have been entered with.
The above compromise formula has been agreed through the good offices of Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate and Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate as well as with the assistance of the various other advocates appearing before this Hon'ble Court."
CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 6 of 15 CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 7 of 15 CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 8 of 15 CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 9 of 15 CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 10 of 15 CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 11 of 15 CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 12 of 15

It is pertinent to mention that no winding up order has been passed against the defendant no. 1-company till date.

Moreover, most of its creditors have settlement agreement and by releasing payments in accordance with the aforesaid consensual order, the plaintiff as well as other applicants/defendants who have filed impleadment applications will receive, in advance, payments till 31 st March, 2019 and reminder of their claims and rights will remain alive and the defendants will also be complying with consensual settlement agreements.

Even those creditors who have no settlement agreement will receive some succour without jeopardizing their rights to file appropriate proceedings.

Consequently, the oral prayer for passing an order in terms of the aforesaid draft consensual order is accepted and it is directed that the draft consensual order reproduced hereinabove shall be read as an order of this Court.

It is also clarified that in the event the Division Bench of this Court directs the defendant no. 9-DIAL to make any payment to defendant no. 2, then the defendant no. 9 shall deposit the said amount in CS (OS) 176/2015 with the Registry of this Court.

With the aforesaid directions, defendant no. 9 is deleted from the array of parties.

The Registrar General is directed to release payments in accordance with the consensual order passed today as well as the schedule annexed thereto.

CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 13 of 15

List before Registrar General on 15th December, 2018 for handing over of cheques to the counsel for the creditors.

List before Court on 31st January, 2019.

I.A. 1337/2015, 12805/2015, 12973/2015, 10221/2017 in CS (OS) 176/2015 Learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs wishes to withdraw the present applications with liberty to re-file the same after 31st March, 2019.

With the aforesaid liberty, present applications stand disposed of as withdrawn.

I.As. 17272/2015 & 17273/2015 in CS (OS) 176/2015 Learned counsel for the applicants/plaintiffs wishes to withdraw the present applications.

Accordingly, the same are dismissed as withdrawn. I.As. 1338/2015, 5001/2015, 20062/2015, 1503-1504/2016, 6234/2018 in CS (OS) 176/2015 Present applications have become infructuous and they accordingly stand disposed of.

I.A. 14310/2015, 23235/2015, 23236/2015 in CS (OS) 176/2015 In view of the order passed today and with the consent of the parties, no further orders are called for in the present applications.

Accordingly, the present applications stand disposed of. I.A. 9444-9447/2016, 10961/2016 in CS (OS) 176/2015 I.A. 11405/2018 in CS (OS) 87/2018 I.A. 11404/2018 in CS (OS) 88/2018 In view of the consensual order passed today, the delay in filing the written statements is condoned and the same are taken on record.

CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 14 of 15

Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of. Order dasti.

MANMOHAN, J OCTOBER 03, 2018 rn CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 15 of 15