Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Chattisgarh High Court

Vandana Neti Pandey vs State Of Chhattisgarh 4 Mac/396/2018 ... on 24 January, 2019

                               HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                                   Order Sheet

                                             WPCR No. 331 of 2017

       • Vandana Neti Pandey W/o Nitesh Pandey, Aged About 27 Years R/o Near Gupta General
         Stores, Beside Choudhari Hotel, Nandini Road, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

                                                                                            ---- Petitioner

                                                      Versus

       1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur,
          District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

       2. Inspector General of Police, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

       3. Superintendent of Police, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

       4. Police Station Officer, Police Station Mohan Nagar, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

       5. Nitesh Pandey S/o Late Jagat Narayan Pandey, Aged About 27 Years R/o Sant Asharam
          Bapu Ward No. 4, Jamul Police Station Jamul Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

       6. Mamta Pandey, W/o Pankaj Pandey, Aged About 30 Years R/o Sant Asharam Bapu Ward No.
          4, Jamul Police Station Jamul Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

       7. Annu Tiwari W/o Gangakant Tiwari, Aged About 32 Years R/o Vaisali Nagar, Supela Bhilai,
          District Durg, Chhattisgarh

       8. Vivek Tiwari Aged About 25 Years R/o Vaisali Nagar, Supela Bhilai, District Durg,
          Chhattisgarh

       9. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department Of Home Affairs, Mantralaya,
          Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

                                                                                      ---- Respondents

24/01/2019 Shri Tarun Dansena, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Aditya Sharma, PL for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition. Prayer is allowed.

As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Sd/-

Goutam Bhaduri Judge ashu