Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ravindra vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 July, 2022

Author: Arun Bhansali

Bench: Arun Bhansali

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8963/2022
1.    Ravindra S/o Parasa Ram, Aged About 24 Years, Village
      Dhadhesari, Kharia Khangar, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.).
2.    Hanuman Ram Goliya S/o Dhagla Ram Goliya, Aged About
      30 Years, Village Khakharki, Dist. Nagaur (Raj.).
                                                                    ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.    State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Fisheries
      Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.    Director, Fisheries Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
      Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.    Fish Farmers Development Agency, Bhilwara, Through The
      District Collector, Bhilwara.
4.    Fish Farmers Development Agency, Tonk, Through The
      District Collector, Tonk.
5.    Fish Farmers Development Agency, Jhalawar, Through The
      District Collector, Jhalawar.
6.    Fish Farmers Development Agency, Chittorgarh, Through
      The District Collector, Chittorgarh.
7.    Fish Farmers Development Agency, Pali, Through The
      District Collector, Pali.
8.    Fish Farmers Development Agency, Udaipur, Through The
      District Collector, Udaipur.
9.    Fish Farmers Development Agency, Ajmer, Through The
      District Collector, Ajmer.
10.   Fish Farmers Development Agency, Kota, Through The
      District Collector, Kota.
11.   Fish   Farmers     Development            Agency,          Sawai   Madhopur,
      Through The District Collector, Sawai Madhopur.
12.   Fish Farmers Development Agency, Banswara, Through The
      District Collector, Banswara.
13.   Fish Farmers Development Agency, Bharatpur, Through The
      District Collector, Bharatpur.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. D.K. Godara.


                     (Downloaded on 01/07/2022 at 08:54:29 PM)
                                                                             (2 of 2)               [CW-8963/2022]


                                   For Respondent(s)        :


                                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order 01/07/2022 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the respondents have issued advertisement dated 6.4.2022 for the post of Fisheries Development Officer and Assistant Fisheries Development Officer for 16 and 15 posts respectively and have provided that the original documents along with application are required to be produced before the District Collector, wherever, the candidates want to apply.

Submissions have been made that the condition of the advertisement requiring the filing of the original documents along with the application necessarily restricts the candidates to applying at one place and for one post only though he may be eligible for both the posts and interested in applying at more than one place, which action of the respondents is not justified as the documents can always be verified once the applicant is found eligible for appointment on urgent temporary basis.

In view of the submissions made, issue notice. Issue notice of the stay application also.

In the meanwhile, the indication made in the advertisement dated 6.4.2022 in condition No.5 to the extent of 'production of the original documents along with the application', shall remain stayed.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 100-Sumit/-

(Downloaded on 01/07/2022 at 08:54:29 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)