Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Chhaganbhai Chhitubhai vs State Of Gujarat & on 28 November, 2013

Author: S.H.Vora

Bench: S.H.Vora

  
	 
	 CHHAGANBHAI CHHITUBHAI....Applicant(s)V/SSTATE OF GUJARAT
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	R/SCR.A/3579/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CRIMINAL
APPLICATION NO. 3579 of 2013
 


 


 

================================================================
 


CHHAGANBHAI
CHHITUBHAI....Applicant(s)
 


Versus
 


STATE OF GUJARAT  & 
2....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

THROUGH
JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 

MR
LR PUJARI APP for the Respondent(s)
================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE S.H.VORA
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 28/11/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

1. Rule.

Learned APP Mr. Pujari waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondents.

2. Vide present application, the convict through jail challenges the order dated 1.11.2013 passed by the competent Authority, Vadodara, whereby the convict s parole leave appilcation for 15 days to enable him to pay fine of Rs.1 Lac is rejected.

3. It appears that the convict is sentenced to suffer 10 year imprisonment and also to pay fine amount of Rs.1 Lac, in default, on year imprisonment under the provisions of NDPS Act. It appears that parole leave application is rejected on the ground that the competent authority has not received police opinion and further the convict should pay fine through other sources. The convict has stated in the application that there is no one in the family, who can arrange such huge amount as fine and it seems that the competent Authority has not considered this fact and without obtaining police opinion rejected the convict s parole leave application.

4. Under the circumstances, present application is required to be allowed and the competent Authority is directed to decide the convict s parole leave application dated 24.9.2013 afresh after obtaining police opinion and after considering the reasons stated by the convict in his application and pass appropriate order within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the same to the convict.

5. In view of the above, present application stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

(S.H.VORA, J.) YNVYAS Page 2 of 2