Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

4. At this stage in his rejoinder arguments counsel for the petitioner submits that since proceedings have to be redrawn in light of Raj Kumar Jaisalwal's case, therefore, he presses for a limited relief that the process may be re-initiated from the initial stage of motion/resolution/proposal/notice. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the only difference would be that in case his argument to violation of Rule 3 of the Rules of 2017 is accepted, then fresh motion shall have to be moved alongwith notice with immediate effect, and if, limited intervention in light of Raj Kumar Jaisalwal is given, then straightway fresh notice shall be issued by the Collector.

5. Counsel for the private respondents and learned Additional Advocate General Ms. Rekha Borana do not oppose re-initiation of proceedings from the stage of notice/motion in accordance with Rule 3 of the Rules of 2017 if the Members propose to do so. This Court also notice that counsel for the petitioner has already accepted rider of Section 53 of the (15 of 15) [CW-1134/2019] Municipalities Act, 2009 shall not come in picture for issuing immediate notice/motion as agreed by both the parties.