Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. By order at Annexure-G, respondent No.4- Taluka Development Officer asked the Police Inspector to provide police protection for the purpose of removal of encroachment from the gamtal land of Bhalpara village and to see that no problem of law and order arise.

4. The grievance voiced in the petition by the petitioner appears to be that the petitioner is a member of the society and he is entitled to use the common plot meant for common uses /activities of the members of the society and such being the private plot, it cannot be used for construction of Anganwadi by the Gram Panchayat. It is the case of the petitioner that in respect of such common plot of the society, the Panchayat could not have passed resolution to construct Bal Anganwadi.

5. It appears that the petitioner has already challenged the resolution passed by the Panchayat before the Taluka Development Officer and requested to pass restraint order not to make any construction on the common plot of the society.

6. Learned advocates for the parties stated that the application preferred by the petitioner, being Misc. Application No.2197 of 2013, challenging the resolution passed by the Panchayat is pending before the Taluka Development Officer as on today and there is broad consensus amongst the parties that if the said application is ordered to be heard within a time bound period, the present matter may not be required to be decided on merits and the interim relief which is granted in the present petition could be ordered to continue till the said application is finally heard and decided by the Taluka Development Officer.