Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: secondary school code in Hindi Vidya Bhavan, Mrs. C.R. Pathak, ... vs Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, ... on 28 September, 2007Matching Fragments
27. The petitioners claim that the respondent-employees, were not members of their staff and that they were the employees of Mithila. The petitioners also have relied upon the documents produced on record to contend that the respondent-emplyees were not employed by the school. However, the fact remains that they were working continuously in the school for more than two years and were rendering services to the pupils of the school which were required to be provided under the provisions of the Act, the rules and the Secondary School Code. Their services were required since the approved/sanctioned staff was not adequate.