Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

7. Coming now to the question of damages, the learned Member has taken note of the fact that though the deceased was a school going boy, he had an aptitude for photography and wanted to follow the foot steps of his father who was working as a photographer in a reputed company. According to Haribhau Shejwal, who is serving as a photographer in Metal Box Company at Worki, Bombay, his son used to be commissioned for photographing certain functions like marriages, thread ceremony etc. He was also excelling in the other ancillary arts like printing, developing and enlarging, was a good sportsman, a swimmer and his father had planned to send him to London to do specialization in Industrial and Commercial Photography. Haribhau had also rented some room and installed machinery for colour processing and had negotiated for a loan from Janata Co-operative Bank for that purpose. According to Haribhau even if the boy did not make it good to the London School, he would have been taken as an apprentice on Rs. 350/- per month stipend and later on absorbed in a pay scale of Rs. 900/- rising to Rs. 3,500/- per month. Hari bhau's second son Siddheswar is physically cripped and mentally retarded and a liability to the family. In these circumstances. Haribhau and his wife were looking towards Dnyaneshwar for dependence after the former's retirement. As the boy was a student, a certain amount of guess work has indubitably to be made regarding the future prospects of a student but considering the probability of the boy in the art of photography. We feel that the reasonable expectation of the family more so with a retarded brother in the household to look after during the first 7 years would be 2/3rd of Rs. 1,000/- per month or about Rs. 8,000/- per year which brings us to a figure of Rs. 56,000/-. During the next 8 years, the boy would have married, raised a family and the allowance which his parents could have expected from him would naturally dwindle to about Rs. 500/- per month or Rs. 6,000/- per year. For this slab of 8 years the aggregate would come to Rs 48,000/-and the total on account of financial loss would come to Rs. 1,04,000/-. To that a sum of Rs. 5,000/- could be added for a loss of expectation of life which brings us to a figure of Rs. 1,09,000/-. As the claimant has restricted his claim only to Rs. 1,00,000/-, we find that the learned Member of the Tribunal was right in awarding the same, the appeal is dismissed with costs.