Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: same class on trademark in Dolphin Mart Private Limited vs Avenue Supermarts Limited & Anr. on 21 August, 2023Matching Fragments
JYOTI SINGH, J.
I.A. 7668/2022 (under Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC, by Defendants)
1. This is an application preferred on behalf of the Defendants for filing additional documents. The documents sought to be brought on record are as follows:-
Sr. Particulars Date of existence
No.
1 Annual Report for Financial 2021
Year 2020-21
2 Trademark registration bearing September 18, 2018
no. 899370 in Class 14
3 Trademark registration bearing March 22, 2018
no. 900816 in Class 21
5 Trademark registration bearing October 02, 2020
no. 2922592 in Class 25
Trademark Class Application No. Validity of Registration 25 578631 05/08/2026 14 1167052 16/01/2023 21 1167051 16/01/2023
30. To deal with this objection, reference be made to Section 25 of the 1999 Act which relates to renewal, removal and restoration of registration. Sub-section (2) provides that the Registrar shall, on application made by the registered proprietor of a trademark in the prescribed manner and within the prescribed period and subject to payment prescribed fee, renew the registration for ten years from the date of expiry of original registration or of the last renewal of registration, as the case may be. Therefore upon renewal, the registrations of the Plaintiff's d'mark trademarks shall take effect from the date of expiry of the earlier registrations, which were prior to the filing of the suit and prima facie it cannot be held that the suit is not maintainable on this score.
31. Before proceeding further, it needs a mention that during the pendency of the suit, Defendants' trademarks in Classes 14, 21 and 25 have been registered and relevant details are as follows :-
Sr. Registration Trademark Class Goods
No. No. & Date
of
Registration
(DOR)
1 899370 14 PRECIOUS METALS
AND THEIR
DOR - ALLOYS AND
18.09.2018 GOODS IN
PRECIOUS METALS
OR COATED
THEREWITH
(EXCEPT
CUTLERY, FORKS
AND SPOONS),
JEWELLERY,
PRECIOUS STONES;
HOROLOGICAL
AND OTHER
CHRONOMETRIC
INSTRUMENTS.
2 900816 D-MART 21 SMALL DOMESTIC
(word mark) UTENSILS AND
DOR - CONTAINERS (NOT
22.03.2018 OF PRECIOUS
METAL NOR
COATED
THEREWITH);
COMBS AND
SPONGES;
BRUSHES (OTHER
THAN PAINT
BRUSHES);
BRUSHMAKING
MATERIALS;
INSTURMENTS
AND MATERIAL
FOR CLEANING
PURPOSES;
STEELWOOL;
GALSSWARE,
PORCELAIN AND
EARTHWARE NOT
INCLUDED IN
OTHER CLASSES.
3 2922592 25 READYMADE
GARMENTS,
DOR - CLOTHING AND
02.10.2020 FOOTWEAR.
33. Since both the Plaintiff and Defendants are registered proprietors of their respective trademarks in Classes 14 and 21, in view of Section 28(3) read with Section 30(2)(e) of the 1999 Act, an action for infringement would not be maintainable at the instance of the Plaintiff and infringement analysis is confined to Defendants' trademark in Class 25. For establishing infringement under Section 29(2) of the 1999 Act, Plaintiff would have to prima facie establish similarity/identity of rival marks, similarity/identity of goods such that there is likelihood of confusion amongst the members of the public and/or likelihood of association. Therefore, the first step would be to see if the rival trademarks in Class 25 are identical or deceptively similar and for which a comparative table is extracted hereunder:-