Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

legal obligation to issue registered legal notice to the complainant for selection of 150 photographs of marriage for the preparation of Canvera Album. There is no evidence on record in order to prove that opposite party had given legal notice to the complainant for selection of 150 marriage photographs for the preparation of Canvera Album. On the contrary photostat messages sent on Facebook annexures R-3 to R-6 are placed on record. Photostat messages sent on Facebook annexures R-3 to R-6 are not attested and not signed by any person. Only photostat copy of Facebook messages has been placed on record. It is held that controversial photostat copies of messages sent through Harsimran Singh Versus Kamaljeet Jaswal (F.A. No.122/2017) Facebook placed on record are not per se admissible and there is no certificate given in annexures R-3 to R-6 that Facebook messages are correct messages of the original messages of Facebook. In the absence of certificate to the effect that facebook messages are correct messages of original Facebook it is not expedient in the ends of justice and on the principle of natural justice to reply upon the unattested and unsigned Facebook messages. It is well settled law that controversial document under Consumer Protection Act 1986 could be proved only as per modes mentioned under Section 13(4) of Consumer Protection Act 1986. It is held that opposite party did not prove Facebook messages as per modes mentioned under Section 13(4) of Consumer Protection Act 1986. Unattested photostat copies of Facebook messages annexures R-3 to R-6 are not signed by anybody. It is well settled law that document placed in quasi-judicial proceedings should be signed by author of document. It is well settled law that proceedings under Consumer Protection Act 1986 are quasi-judicial proceedings. It is held that unattested and unsigned photostat controversial Facebook messages are not admissible in evidence under Consumer Protection Act 1986.