Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3.3 The matter was heard by the Commission. The respondents stated that the complainant had sought reasons for summoning her which does not fall in the category of information as defined u/s 2(f) of the RTI Act and any attempt to reply would be construed as the legal and personal opinion of the CPIO. Moreover, the rules under which the DRT functions also prohibit DRT to provide information on pending judicial cases.

3.4 On hearing the respondents and going through the available record, the Commission observes that the respondent authority has replied appropriately and upholds the decision of the FAA. The complaint is closed.