Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

iv) Fabricated disclosure statement and recovery of currency notes from accused no. 5.

During the course of trial, at the stage of compliance of Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused persons were supplied several documents along with the chargesheet, including some duplicate documents pertaining to the same information as the other analogous well manipulated documents. Some of such documents are:-

viii) Fabricated identification of accused no. 5.

State vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra & Ors.

FIR No.71/2005, PS: Special Cell (Civil Lines) 49/69 In the present case, at the stage of compliance with Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused persons were supplied several documents along with the chargesheet, including some duplicate documents pertaining to the same information as the other analogous well manipulated documents.

The following discrepant and duplicate documents of the same nature regarding the identification of accused No. 5 by Rahul Sharma and Zakir Ali further strengthens the argument of the defense that the investigation is fabricated:

Ex. PW-26/DC is the Ex. PW-1/S-15 is also pointing out pointing out memo of memo of accused Gokharan by accused Gokharan by Rahul Sharma.

Rahul Sharma.

State vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra & Ors.

FIR No.71/2005, PS: Special Cell (Civil Lines)                        53/69
           According to Ex. PW-                   According to Ex. PW-1.S-15, Rahul
          26/DC, Rahul Sharma                    Sharma       identified  accused
          identified    accused                  Gokharan at G-149, Sector Beta,
          Gokharan at F-90,                      Greater Noida, U.P.
          Alpha-II,      Greater
          Noida, U.P. However,
          the said document
          does not bear the
          signatures of Rahul
          Sharma. It does not
          even bear any date.                    This is a fabricated and manipulated
                                                 document which was prepared later
                                                 on by the police to fill in the gaps in
                                                 the story of prosecution.

                                                 It is a well manipulated document
                                                 with and contains the signatures of
                                                 Rahul Sharma (victim), Umesh
                                                 Barthwal and Girish Kumar along
                                                 with date.




         e)        Discrepant and Duplicate documents of the same

f) Several other discrepant and duplicate documents:

In the present case, at the stage of compliance with Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused persons were supplied several documents along with the charge sheet, including some duplicate documents pertaining to the same information as the other analogous well manipulated documents. There is a series of such pair of analogous documents of the same nature and some of them are indicated herein below:
State vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra & Ors.