Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Manipulated document in State vs . 1) Ashok Kr. Mishra on 6 April, 2018Matching Fragments
iv) Fabricated disclosure statement and recovery of currency notes from accused no. 5.
During the course of trial, at the stage of compliance of Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused persons were supplied several documents along with the chargesheet, including some duplicate documents pertaining to the same information as the other analogous well manipulated documents. Some of such documents are:-
viii) Fabricated identification of accused no. 5.
State vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra & Ors.
FIR No.71/2005, PS: Special Cell (Civil Lines) 49/69 In the present case, at the stage of compliance with Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused persons were supplied several documents along with the chargesheet, including some duplicate documents pertaining to the same information as the other analogous well manipulated documents.
The following discrepant and duplicate documents of the same nature regarding the identification of accused No. 5 by Rahul Sharma and Zakir Ali further strengthens the argument of the defense that the investigation is fabricated:
Ex. PW-26/DC is the Ex. PW-1/S-15 is also pointing out pointing out memo of memo of accused Gokharan by accused Gokharan by Rahul Sharma.
Rahul Sharma.
FIR No.71/2005, PS: Special Cell (Civil Lines) 53/69
According to Ex. PW- According to Ex. PW-1.S-15, Rahul
26/DC, Rahul Sharma Sharma identified accused
identified accused Gokharan at G-149, Sector Beta,
Gokharan at F-90, Greater Noida, U.P.
Alpha-II, Greater
Noida, U.P. However,
the said document
does not bear the
signatures of Rahul
Sharma. It does not
even bear any date. This is a fabricated and manipulated
document which was prepared later
on by the police to fill in the gaps in
the story of prosecution.
It is a well manipulated document
with and contains the signatures of
Rahul Sharma (victim), Umesh
Barthwal and Girish Kumar along
with date.
e) Discrepant and Duplicate documents of the same
f) Several other discrepant and duplicate documents:
In the present case, at the stage of compliance with Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused persons were supplied several documents along with the charge sheet, including some duplicate documents pertaining to the same information as the other analogous well manipulated documents. There is a series of such pair of analogous documents of the same nature and some of them are indicated herein below:
State vs. Ashok Kumar Mishra & Ors.