Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: acid attack case in Tannu vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 15 July, 2022Matching Fragments
11. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer of appellants and submitted that this is a case of acid attack and PW-1 and PW-2 have supported the prosecution version and court below has rightly convicted the appellants, therefore, appeal is liable to be dismissed.
12. After hearing the submission of learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned A.G.A. and going through the record of the case, it is evident that P.W.1 and P.W.2 are the eye witnesses and they supported the prosecution version and their testimony corroborate the medical evidence. The deposition of P.W.1 and P.W.2 clearly reveals that after throwing the acid, accused persons ran away, meaning thereby the act done by the accused persons without any intention to cause death. It is also evident from the record that the said incident was taken place on 12.07.1996, but the injured died on 09.09.1996.