Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: tomato paste in Asstt. Cit vs Pepsi Foods Ltd. on 8 August, 2002Matching Fragments
"PFL has received technology and know-how for varietal improvement of tomatoes and for the production of tomato paste. Relevant technology for other products such as chillies is still in the process of being received. However, this line of activity is a highly limited and a seasonal one, and the plant established by PFL for the manufacture of tomato paste works for only two months in a year. PFL has also availed of limited know-how for manufacture of patato chips and some cornflour extruded products. However, even here, it has not been able to avail of technology on the entire spectrum of processed patato foods and processed grain products."
The above submission also makes it clear that there was transfer of technology for varietal improvement of tomatoes and production of tomato paste, tomato chips and cornflour extruded products. To the same effect is the statement of facts filed before the Tribunal appearing at page 3 onwards of the paper book. At page 4, it has been stated as under :
"The agreement was filed with the RBI on 19-9-1989. Your appeliant has received technology and know-how for varietal improvement of tomatoes and for the production of tomato paste. Relevant technology for other products such as chillies is still in the process of being received. Your appellant has also availed of limited know-how for manufacture of potato chips and some cornflour extruded products. However, even here, it has not been able to avail of technology on the entire spectrum of processed potato foods and processed grain goods.