Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

For the reasons recorded above, we find merit in the complaint and the same is allowed. OPs are directed :-
i)  To deliver the peaceful possession of the plot No.65 in Group Housing Scheme under the name of Omaxe Parkwoods, Baddi-II situated at Baddi, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, to the complainant.
ii) To pay interest @9% p.a. on the payments made by the complainant w.e.f. 24.8.2010 till the handing over of the possession of the plot to the complainant.
iii)    To pay compensation to the tune of Rs.1 lac to the complainant for causing physical as well as mental harassment.
iv)     To pay litigation costs to the extent of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant.

This order shall be complied with by the OPs within one month from the date of receipt of its certified copy, failing which, the amounts mentioned at S.No.(ii) to (iii) of the para aforesaid shall carry penal interest @12% p.a. from the date of filing of the present complaint, till its realization, besides costs of litigation, as mentioned above.

2.      The facts, in brief, are that Mrs. Mamta Mittal, provisionally booked a residential plot, with the Opposite Parties, in a Group Housing Project, under the name and style Omaxe Parkwoods BaddiII, to be developed and constructed, on the land situated at Baddi, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh (H.P.). On 26.11.2007, according to the Time Linked Payment Plan, the provisional allottee/assignor Mrs.Mamta Mittal, made payment of first installment, to the tune of Rs.94,530/-, over and above the stipulated amount of 10% of the basic sale price, which was Rs.92,192/-. The Plot bearing No.65, having an approximate area of 137.6 sq. mtrs., was allotted, in the name of Mrs. Mamta Mittal, vide provisional allotment letter dated 25.02.2008, Annexure C-1. On 21.04.2008, all the rights and interests, whatsoever, pertaining to the said plot, including payments made in that regard, were endorsed/assigned, in favour of the complainant, vide endorsement form Annexure C-2. An agreement dated 24.11.2008 was executed between the parties. The total price of the plot was Rs.9,66,920/-. It was stated that 95% payment of the total price, by way of installments, as per the Time Linked Payment Plan, was made by the complainant, to the Opposite Parties, by 14.01.2009, at their Branch Office, at Chandigarh, vide various receipts Annexures C-3(I) to (VI) (colly.). It was further stated that, according to the said Agreement, the legal and physical possession of the said plot was to be delivered to the complainant, by the Opposite Parties, within 15 months, from the date of signing the same (Agreement), which period could be extended by another 6 months, as mentioned in Clause 25(a) of the same (Agreement). Thus, possession of the plot, in question, was to be delivered to the complainant, by 24.08.2010, including the extended period of six months.

12.   The principal question, that arises, for consideration, is, as to whether, the District Forum had got the territorial Jurisdiction, to entertain and decide the complaint, or not. Admittedly, the project, in the name and style of Omaxe Parkwoods, BaddiII, in which the plot, in question, was originally allotted to Mrs.Mamta Mittal, is situated at Baddi, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh (H.P.). There is also, no dispute, with regard to the factum that later on, the said plot, was transferred in the name of the complainant, as he purchased the same, from Mrs.Mamta Mittal. The rights and interests, in the plot were transferred, in the name of the complainant, at Delhi, as is evident, from Annexure C-2, copy of the endorsement form, which bears the photo-impression of the stamp of Omaxe Ltd., New Delhi. No doubt, according to the complainant, payments towards the price of the said plot, were made at the Branch Office of the Opposite Parties, at Chandigarh. However, no document was produced, on the record, showing that these payments were made at Chandigarh. Receipt Annexure C-3 (I) dated 26.11.2007, vide which, a sum of Rs.94,530/-, towards part price of the plot, was deposited through cheque with Omaxe Limited, and issued by an authorized signatory, bears the address of the Opposite Parties, as Omaxe House, 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kaklaji, New Delhi-110019. Copy of the receipt Annexure C-3(II) letter regarding intimation of due installment, also does not show that it was issued at Chandigarh. Another receipt dated 12.05.2008, copy whereof is at page 20 of the District Forum file shows that two cheques dated 12.05.2008, in the sum of Rs.1,60,000/- and Rs.22,000/- respectively, were issued, to the Opposite Parties. No doubt, these cheques were drawn on the ICICI Bank, Chandigarh, yet, it is evident, from copy of the said receipt, that the address of the Opposite Parties written thereon was Omaxe House, 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kaklaji, New Delhi-110019. It is signed by an authorized signatory of the Opposite Parties. There is nothing, in this receipt, to show that it was issued at Chandigarh. Similarly, the receipts, copies whereof, are at pages 22, 24, 25 and 26 of the District Forum file, vide which, various payments towards price of the plot were made by the complainant, do not show that these were issued at Chandigarh, or the amount was received by any of the authorized signatory of the Opposite Parties, at Chandigarh. These receipts bear the address of Omaxe House, 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kaklaji, New Delhi-110019. Similar is the case, in respect of the receipt, copy whereof is at page 28 of the District Forum file. It was for the complainant, to prove that he actually made payments, at the Branch Office of the Opposite Parties, at Chandigarh, and the receipts were issued to him, by an authorized signatory, of the Branch office, at Chandigarh. Since, the complainant failed to prove this factum, that any cause of action accrued to him, within the territorial Jurisdiction of Chandigarh, in our considered opinion, the District Forum, at Chandigarh, had no territorial Jurisdiction, to entertain and decide the complaint. While interpreting the provisions of Section 17(2)(b) of the Act, which are para-materia to Section 11 of the Act, in  Sonic Surgical Vs National Insurance Company Ltd. IV(2009) CPJ 40(SC), the Apex Court held as under ;