Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: EdCIL in Mr. M L Gouhari vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 21 January, 2011Matching Fragments
Decision
2. During the hearing the Respondent from the Central Vigilance Commission provided a copy of the investigation report on the complaint dated 26.9.2008 as sought by the Appellant . With regard to action taken by the Management of EdCIL on the investigation report, the Respondent from the EdCIL submitted that the designated agency to deal with PIDR matter is CVC. He produced before the Commission , the office Order in this connection issued by the Secretary CVC dated 17.5.2009. The Commission having noted that the comments/recommendation by EdCIL have been sent to CVC for a final decision to be taken by the CVC on the basis of these inputs recommends strongly that the decision be taken and conveyed to the Appellant preferably within a month of receipt this order . The CPIO, MHRD may convey this recommendation to the concerned officer in the Vigilance Commission.
3. The Public Information Officer EdCIL(India) Ltd Ed.CIL House 18A, Sector - 16A Noida - 201301.
4. The Appellate Authority EdCIL(India) Ltd Ed.CIL House 18A, Sector - 16A Noida - 201301.
5. The PIO Central Vigilance Commission Satarkta Bhawan Block - A GPO Complex INA New Delhi.
6. Officer Incharge, NIC.