Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parcha 12 in State vs . 1. Lala Ram @ Vishal @ Kale on 9 December, 2010Matching Fragments
In his further cross-examination by the Ld. Defence Counsel the witness has denied that all accused persons have been falsely implicated or that he has not annexed Parcha 12 of the accused persons along with the charge sheet.
PW6 HC Majid Khan is the PCR official who has deposed that on 23.12.2008 he was posted as Incharge PCR on PCR Van Commander C57 and was on duty from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm along with HC Udmiram gunman. According to him, on that day at around 1.35 pm when they were present near telephone exchange Aryabhatt Poly technique at GTK Road suddenly one blue line bus no. DL-IPA-7720, route no.19 came there and stopped as one person was crying from the bus that his pocket has been picked. He has deposed that after hearing the noise he along with HC Udmiram went inside the bus and the passengers told that accused were four in number and were standing inside the bus and as soon as the person pointed out towards the accused persons the accused tried to flee away. The witness has further deposed that as soon as the accused tried to flee away they apprehended four accused persons and all were carrying open knife and one of them also was having money in his hand. PW6 has testified that they apprehended the accused persons with the help of conductor, driver of the bus and with the help of other public persons after which the accused persons were brought down from the bus and the money was found to be Rs.33,500/- which were recovered from the possession of one of the accused. According to the witness, he informed the control room and thereafter ASI Richpal Singh along with two constables came there and he handed over all the four accused along with four knives and money to the investigating officer. The witness is unable to tell the name of the accused persons and has deposed that the investigating officer sealed all the four knives and money which were recovered from the accused persons and the investigating officer recorded statement of complainant. He has proved that the investigating officer prepared the rukka and got the FIR registered and has proved the memos of the knives which are Ex.PW1/F to Ex.PW1/I. He has further deposed that thereafter the investigating officer took all of them to the police station. The witness has correctly identified the four accused in the court as the persons who were apprehended by them and also the accused Prakash @ Om Prakash as per person who was having money and knife but he does not remember the name of the other accused persons.