Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

In support of the aforesaid application learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance in the matter of Zoom Developers Pvt. Ltd and Camoron Finance and Investments Vs. Viral Enterprises and others, reported in 2004 (3) MHLJ 306 and in the matter of Raj Enterprises Vs. Sul India Limited, reported in 2006 (3) MPJR 296 and contended that in absence of any stipulation in notice for sale of terms and conditions prohibiting the execution of sale deed in favour of the nominee of the purchaser and in absence of any provisions in the Companies Act, 1956 and the Rules 272 and 273 for the same, the purchaser will have the option to have the sale deed executed in favour of his nominee. Thus, where there is no prohibition in the law the direction for execution of sale deed in favour of the nominee can very well be issued.