Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
5. Last, but not least in our appreciation of the law, Section 482 of the CrPC stands in solitary splendour. It saves the inherent power of the High Court. It enunciates that nothing in the CrPC shall be deemed to limit or affect the inherent powers of the High Court to make such orders as may be necessary firstly to (a) ‗give effect to any order under the CrPC', words which are not to be found in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‗CPC'). While exercising inherent powers, therefore, the High Court, in its criminal jurisdiction, can take all necessary steps for compliance of its orders. The High Court need not, therefore, resort to the tenets of Contempt of Court. Section 482, therefore, makes the Criminal Court much more powerful than the Civil Court so far as obedience to orders is concerned. Secondly, Section 482 clarifies that the CrPC does not circumscribe the actions available to the High Court to prevent abuse of its process from the beginning of its proceedings till their very end. Judicial process includes compelling a respondent to appear before it. When the Court is faced with a recalcitrant appellant/convict who shows no interest in his appeal, none of the Section in Chapter-XXIX of the CrPC dealing with appeals would preclude it from dismissing the appeals. Whenever such orders are passed, it would have the effect of making it clear to all concerned that intentional and repeated failure to prosecute the appeal would inexorably lead not merely to the cancellation of bail but to the confirmation of the conviction and sentence because of the dismissal of the appeal. Thirdly, none of the provisions of the CrPC can possibly limit the power of the High Court to otherwise secure the ends of justice. It is not possible to define the concept of ‗justice'. Suffice it to say that it encompasses not just rights of the accused and the convict. It also includes law abiding section of society who look towards the Courts as vital instruments for preservation of peace and curtailment of crime by means of imposing punishment on those who break the law. If convicts can circumvent the rigors of their conviction, peace and harmony in society will become an illusion. Section 482 emblazons the fact that there is a difference between preventing the abuse of the jural process and the securing of the ends of justice. In our analysis, Section 482 of the CrPC has not been given its due regard and importance, and as a consequence, the rampant practice of filing appeals only for frustrating a sentence given by a criminal court has been fine-tuned. It has led not merely to an explosion of dockets in criminal courts, already afflicted by an adverse ratio of judges to the population, but has given fillip to the filing of appeals by convicts whose objective is not of convincing the Appellate Court that they have been dealt with unfairly or illegally, but to escape from the punishment that their crime has invited.