Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

signed above his name (Praveen Kumar) while the other Ashok Kumar Gupta signed in the left side of rubber stamp of his name. The rubber stamp even does not disclose about his address or enrollment number. One original document Ex. PW- 1/3 (conveyance deed) was also filed by the petitioner. This document also bears the signature and stamp of Ashok Kumar Gupta on the last page. During his cross-examination the photocopy of the same conveyance deed was put to Sh. Ashok Kumar Gupta/ PW-5 and it was exhibited as Ex. PW-4/2, to which he answered that he had drafted, typed and attested this document. This document was put to him to check his veracity to his claim that whatever document is drafted by him, the document bears his name duly typed and the document which he does not drafted and merely signs as a attesting witness, bears rubber stamp of his name. He claimed so during his cross-examination dated 09.06.2017, when a specific question was put to him that "How do you distinguish a document drafted by you from a document drafted by somebody else?"

When we compare document Ex. PW-4/2 with Will Ex. PW- 1/1 then signatures of PW-5 on document Ex. PW-4/2 at point A appears to be made in the same fashion as at point C on the Will Ex. PW-1/1. Admittedly, the document Ex. PW-4/2 was drafted and typed by him. The document Ex. PW-4/2 also bears Shanta Rani Vs. Govt. Of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

signatures and details of attesting witnesses namely Praveen Kumar and Kamal Arora on its last page at the specified place. The rubber stamp and signature of Ashok Kumar Gupta on this document is also on the last page but not at the place of witnesses but below the names and signatures of the attesting witnesses after leaving some gap. When the document was already attested by two witnesses then three witnesses were not required to attest the document, so apart from the admission of Ashok Kumar Gupta that he signed this document in the capacity of drafter, on the basis of this observation also it can safely be concluded that document Ex. PW-4/2 was stamped and signed by Ashok Kumar Gupta in the capacity of its drafter. On the Will in question in the present case, the last page of the Will shows serial no. 1 & 2 at the space where the word 'witness' has been written. However, the space against both the serial numbers has been filled with the details and signatures of only single witness i.e. Praveen Kumar. The stamp and signatures of Ashok Kumar Gupta/ PW5 are at bottom of the last page below the details of the first witness after leaving the similar gap as in the document Ex. PW-4/2. It is also the case of Ashok Kumar Gupta/ PW-5 that he had never met the testatrix prior to the date of execution of the Will i.e. 25.03.1997. It is also admitted position of PW-5 that he was Shanta Rani Vs. Govt. Of NCT of Delhi & Ors.