Skip to main content
Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
But the TPO did not agree with the above study and matrix
because M/s VJIL Consulting Ltd had incurred losses for 2 years
including the relevant financial year, and there was no foreign
exchange earnings of M/s Shree Tulsi Online.com during the
relevant financial year. The other reason was that the assessee
had used 3 years' data, instead of one year data,
the assessee informed. But the assessee contended that
retention of loss making comparable companies alongside
profitable companies tends to even out the risk profile of
comparable companies, and so a company with losses cannot be
rejected outright as a comparable on that ground alone, if it is still
a going concern or its losses do not exceed its net worth.
Appropriate analysis for reasons for losses has to be undertaken
before selection or rejection of a comparable company. The
assessee felt that loss filter applied by the TPO was erroneous
and should be rejected. Reference was drawn to the decision of
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi in Sony India
Private Limited (reference: ITA No. 1189/Del/2005,
819&820/DeI!2oo7). In the said case, the Tribunal had observed
that the facts and circumstances surrounding the company
should determine its status as a comparable, not its
financial result. The Tribunal had also stated that exclusion of
loss-making comparable is not justified as the loss situation is
normal for the business. Further, Para 3.65 of the Transfer
Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax
Administrations issued by the Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development ("the OECD Guidelines") states,
"......Loss-making comparable that satisfy the comparability
analysis should not however be rejected on the sole basis that
they suffer losses." The assessee informed that VJIL Consulting
Ltd is not a persistent loss making company. As per the annual
report, the company experienced losses due to decrease in
turnover, provision for doubtful debts and change in accounting
procedures. Further, as per the annual report, the operations of
the company were badly affected due to differences in the
management.