Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 355 in State By Savadatti Police Station vs Vishnath @ Anand on 6 May, 2020Matching Fragments
Accused No.1 and 2 have been charge sheeted by Deputy Superintendent of Polie, Ramadurga Sub-Division, Belagavi District for the offences punishable Under Sec.323, 355, 504, 506 r/w 34 of IPC and Sec.3(1)(r)(s) S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities)Act 1989 (Amendment 2015).
2. Brief and relevant facts leading to the case of the prosecution are as under:-
That the complainant by name Hanumantappa Govindappa Appanaikar r/o Khagadal village in Saundatti Taluq, Belagavi District filed complaint on 30.4.2018 at 8.15 p.m. before SHO, Savadatti Police Station, Belagavi District alleging that, on 29-04-2018 @ 5.00 p.m, when the
2) Whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that, on the above said date, time, and place, the accused No.1 and 2 herein, in furtherance of their common intention, being enraged by the words used by 10 Spl.CC 95/2019 CW1 as aforesaid assaulted him and did so otherwise than on grave and sudden provocation and thereby committed offence punishable U/s. 355 r/w 149 of IPC?
71. Point No.6:- As a result of my foregoing discussion and reasons stated thereon, accused No.1 and 2 52 Spl.CC 95/2019 are entitled for acquittal by giving benefit doubt of the offences alleged against them. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:-
ORDER Acting under Sec.235(1) of Cr.P.C., accused No.1 and 2 are acquitted of the charge leveled against them for the offences punishable Under Sec.323, 355, 504, 506 r/w 34 of IPC and Sec.3(1)(r)(s) S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (Amendment 2015) by giving benefit of doubt.
Nil LXXXI ACC & SJ, Bengaluru City (CCH-82) rrk.
55 Spl.CC 95/2019 6.5.2020 Certificate with regard to pronouncement of judgment is kept in the file.
Case taken today for pronouncement of judgment. Judgment pronounced through video conferencing. (vide separate judgment) ORDER Acting under Sec.235(1) of Cr.P.C., accused No.1 and 2 are acquitted of the charge leveled against them for the offences punishable Under Sec.323, 355, 504, 506 r/w 34 of IPC and Sec.3(1)(r)(s) S.C. and S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (Amendment 2015) by giving benefit of doubt.