Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4. The defendant No. 2 is well established in India as a progressive and professional Freight Forwarding and Logistics Management Company, and it offers a broad range of services covering Sea, Air Logistic and Projects.

5. On receipt of Writ of Summons, the defendants have entered appearance and have filed their respective written statements.

6. CASE OF THE PLAINTIFFS

a) On 14th October, 2014, one Mr. K. Prasad representing himself to be an officer of the defendant no.1 approached the plaintiff particularly one of the Director of the plaintiff Company, namely Mr. Ramesh Kejriwal and expressed their intention to take a large warehouse in or around Kolkata on rental basis and for that purpose sought for the brokerage service of the plaintiff.

8. CASE OF THE DEFENDANT NO. 2:

a) The Defendant No.2 is well established in India as progressive and professional Freight Forwarding and Logistics Management Company and it offers a broad range of services covering Sea, Air Logistics and Projects.
b) The Defendant no.1 as mentioned earlier is the largest e-retailer in the market and it requires services and supports from the logistic industry, due to which the Defendant No.1 and the Defendant no. 2 share a business relation since 22nd December, 2014, by way of Master Service Agreement executed by and between the defendant no. 1 and defendant no. 2. It was agreed that the Defendant no.2 will provide logistics support to the Defendant no.1 by looking for warehouse spaces and man-power for its business.