Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4. Complainant 'B' further alleged in her complaint that thereafter Accused Vikram Singh started calling her on phone and demanded Rs. 10,000/­ from her by extending threats that in case she would not give him the money, she would have to face the dire consequences. After few days, accused Mangal Singh called her on her mobile to come at Sonepat and assured her that he will help her and assured her of justice as Vikram Singh had committed wrong with her. When complainant reached Sonepat, accused Mangal Singh again asked her to reach his village at Chatiya, Sonepat. Upon reaching the said village Chatiya, accused Mangal Singh did not meet her. Thereafter, she met Sh.Lakhi Singh, father of accused Vikram Singh, who called her brother, Surinder Singh and informed him that she had came to Village Chatiya and accordingly her brother Surinder Singh took her back to her village. Thereafter, upon inquiry from her brother, she narrated the entire incident to him. Thereafter, when Surinder Singh asked as to why they had did so, Vikram Singh, Mangal Singh (Jija of Mangal Singh), Lakhi Singh (father of Vikram Singh) and Gurmeet Singh (son of Tau of accused Vikram) had threatened him to kill her family members.

6. During the course of investigation, on 30.07.2015 accused Vikram Singh and Mangal Singh appeared at PS Rai Distt. Sonepat, Haryana, where they were duly interrogated and thereafter arrested in this case by the IO of this case. Their disclosure statements were got recorded and potency test of both the accused was also got conducted. Thereafter, both the accused were produced before the court, which ordered for their Judicial Custody.

11. He also deposed that on 21.07.2014, he was called by Lakhi Singh, father of accused Vikram Singh, who informed him that Beena is present at their village i.e. village Chatiya Oliya near Sonepat and he asked him to take back his sister. He along with his other family members went to village Chatiya Oliya and brought Beena with them to their house. When he asked his sister about the reason of her going to village Chatiya Oliya, she told him that on 07.04.2014 when she went to G. B. Pant Hospital for her treatment, accused Vikram Singh along with his jija namely Mangal Singh met her there. His sister i.e. Prosecutrix further told him that both the accused gave her tea and after consuming it, she became semi­conscious and they forcibly made her sit in a TSR and when she raised alarm, public persons gathered there, but accused Vikram Singh told public persons that she is his wife and she has mental problem and they both took her to a place somewhere at Yamuna Paar and accused Vikram Singh committed rape upon her. His sister further told him that accused persons threatened her that if she discloses about the incident to anyone, they will defame her in the society as they have prepared her obscene video and photographs. His sister further told him that accused persons made her sit in a TSR and then she came back to his house. She further told him that she was called by accused Mangal Singh on 21.07.2014 stating that he will help her in apprehending accused Vikram Singh and to get her justice and asked her to come at village Chatiya Oliya. His sister further told him that accused Vikram Singh asked his sister to give Rs. 10,000/­ to him, otherwise he will defame her in the society.

34. In the light of the aforesaid statement of Prosecutrix, the entire caes of the Prosecution that she was called by accused Mangal Singh on the pretext of getting her justice, completely stands demolished. Even otherwise, it hardly appeals to reason that an alleged rape victim would agree to go from her own village, admittedly without informing her family members, to meet co­accused of the offence and that too in the village of the main culprit i.e. Village Chatiya, Sonepat, where accused Vikram Singh is admittedly residing. Interestingly, it has also come in the cross­examination of her brother PW­4 that the Prosecutrix also took alone two of her children when she went to the village Chatiya, Sonepat. This conduct of the Prosecutrix is totally unexplainable and creates a serious doubt about the veracity of her claim.