Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: tenancy devolving in Sushil Kumar Jain vs Raj Rani & Anr on 28 November, 2019Matching Fragments
11. These facts, having been arrived at by the ld. Rent Controller and having been upheld by the Rent Control Tribunal, constitute concurrent findings on fact. The findings of the ld. Rent Controller are extracted hereinbelow:
"7. It was further argued that the written statement already filed on record by respondent clearly reflects that respondent has admitted that after the death of Sh. Sultan Singh, he is the sole proprietor of the respondent, and he has not raised any objection that all the legal heirs of Sh. Sultan Singh were not made party. Ld. counsel has vehemently argued that the tenancy was not a tenancy-in-common, and rather it was joint tenancy of Sh. Sultan Singh and Sh. Vinod Kumar Jain and after the death of Sh. Sultan Singh, all the rights-in-tenancy devolved upon Sh. Vinod Kumar Jain, being proprietor of M/s Sultan Singh Vinod Kumar and no third person has any tenancy right in the shop.