Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

In support of his case, learned counsel for the appellant has vehemently argued that the suit should have been decreed simply on the ground that the revised plan has been duly sanctioned by the Competent Authority i.e. Director Town and Country Planning and the aforesaid revised site plan has not been challenged by the respondent and the changes are being carried out in accordance with the aforesaid sanctioned plan and therefore, the defendant-respondent have no right to take law in its own hands and interfere in the construction work of the appellant and they are required to be restrained from doing the same. Moreover, the defendant is not even remotely affected by the construction being carried out by the appellant and whatever land is sought to be withdrawn on the basis of the revised plan has been compensated from the other colony. Moreover, the construction work is in fact for the welfare and security of the residents of the Residency Green Residents Welfare Association. Learned counsel has further argued that from the site plan Ex.P-17 and P-19, it is clear that slight change is sought to be made in the Vista Villas colony and defendant is not being effected in any manner. Counsel for the appellant has further argued that every act of the Government Authorities is to be presumed to have been done in good faith for valid reasons and in accordance with law. In the present case, revision of site plan duly sanctioned by the DTCP has not even been challenged. Moreover the agreement between the parties clearly envisages that the changes/alterations can be made out in a lay out plan by the DTCP. The said agreement between the parties is binding and the defendant has nothing to do with the open/common areas and have no right except the plot/flats sold to them and thus, the judgment and decrees of the Courts below are liable to be set aside and the plaintiff-appellants are entitled to be decreed as prayed.