Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

4. The plaint schedule property is an extent of Ac.0.9 gts. in Survey No.85/1 of Manikonda Jagir Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

5. According to the appellants, Late P. Vishnuvardhan Rao, husband of the 1st appellant and father of appellants 2 and 3, purchased the said property under a registered Sale Deed bearing Document No.7108/97 dt.13.10.1997 (Ex.P.2) from the original owner S. Jangaiah and others who were the pattadars of the land. They contended that the said Sri P. ::2:: MSR,J & TA,J cma_52&53_2020 Vishnuvardhan Rao died on 25.12.2010, and they inherited the property on his death. 

                                     ::3::                    MSR,J & TA,J
                                                              cma_52&53_2020

9. Appellants contend that there was considerable development in respect of the lands, and the boundaries which are available in 2008 would not be available in 2016 when O.S.No.377 of 2008 came up for leading evidence, and the said Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, without getting the properties surveyed, dismissed the suit.

13. They denied that in January, 2017 they encroached and trespassed into the suit schedule property. According to them, the appellants are not the owners or possessors of the suit schedule property, that the vendors of ::4:: MSR,J & TA,J cma_52&53_2020 P. Vishnuvardhan Rao were not in any way concerned with the suit schedule property, and the appellants did not file any link documents to show that his vendors were the owners of the suit schedule property. 

                                   ::12::                     MSR,J & TA,J
                                                              cma_52&53_2020

52. Pending decision by the Trial Court afresh in I.A.Nos.618 and 619 of 2017, the respondents are restrained from alienating / transferring the suit schedule property to any third-party and also changing / altering the nature of the suit schedule property.

53. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are allowed as above. Consequently, IA No 4/2020 in CMA 53 of 2020 and IA. No.3 of 2020 in CMA No.52 /2020 are dismissed. No order as to costs.