Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: IPC 219 in Manpreet Singh vs U.T. Chandigarh And Another on 1 February, 2011Matching Fragments
Criminal Misc. No.5626 of 2011 Application is allowed and reply of respondent No.2 is taken on record.
Criminal Misc. No. M-11585 of 2010 The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 219 dated 27.5.2003 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).
On 20.5.2010 an affidavit of Ritu Dhir had been filed stating that the matter has been compromised. A special power of attorney dated 04.8.2003 has been placed on record authorizing Ms. Ritu Dhir to compromise the matter. However, this power of attorney did not authorize Ritu Dhir to compromise the matter with regard to FIR No.219 dated 27.5.2003, registered at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh. Vide criminal miscellaneous No.5626 of 2011 affidavit of Ritu Dhir wife of late R.K. Dhir has been filed alongwith special power of attorney dated 03.12.2010.
8. That the parties have mutually agreed to jointly seek quashing of the criminal case i.e. case FIR No.219, dated 27.05.2003 under Section 498-A, 406 IPC at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh, registered by Dr. Gauri against Manpreet Singh. In this regard, Dr. Gauri, either personally or through her Special Power of Attorney shall appear before the court of competent jurisdiction or any police official and make the necessary/requisite statement for the quashing of the case FIR No.219, dated 27.05.2003 under Sections 498-A, 406 IPC registered at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh against Manpreet Singh.
Attested copy of Special Power of Attorney (Annexure A-1) is taken on record. After going through the contents of the Special Power of Attorney, filed by Ritu Dhir, compromise deed is genuine and in view of this, FIR No. 219 dated 27.5.2003 under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh, is quashed with all consequential proceedings qua petitioner in view of law laid down in Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052.