Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

6. The petitioners and the first respondent have filed E.A.Nos.99/2011, 100/2011 and 101/2011 in E.P.No.26 of 2011 for stay of the execution proceedings and claim petitions on the file of the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam. They also filed suit for partition in O.S.No.280 of 2010. The issue involved in both the proceedings are different. Further, E.P.No.26 of 2011, is for execution of decree of ejectment. The suit filed by the petitioners and the first respondent is for partition. In the circumstances, the question of joint trial to avoid conflicting decisions and multiplicity of proceedings did not arise. Further, E.P.No.26 of 2010 is to execute the decree already passed. As far as the suit filed by the petitioners and the first respondent is concerned, the same is riped for trial. In the circumstances, the learned Judge has rightly appreciated the facts and dismissed the applications. There is no irregularity or illegality in the said order, warranting interference by this Court.