Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that both, respondent No. 2 Smt. Tophali and respondent no. 3 Siya Ram Sharma were not trained for midwifery and they administered wrong injection to the wife of the petitioner Guddi and forcibly (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3652/2013] withheld, wife of the petitioner from attending hospital, where the delivery could have taken place safely without any injury to the spouse of petitioner and begotting baby but both the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 acted negligently, which caused a still delivery and uterus of the spouse of petitioner was subjected to grave injury.