Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

the police that when she tried to raise alarm, she was informed by the bail petitioner that there is none to save her because her father had gone to hospital for inoculation. Interestingly, house of the bail petitioner is otherwise opposite to the house of the victim/prosecutrix, meaning thereby there was opportunity to the victim/prosecutrix to call somebody from the house of the bail petitioner, if she was being subjected to forcible sexual intercourse by the bail petitioner against her wishes. Sequences of events given in the status report, if read in entirety, certainly compels this Court to agree with Mr. N.K.Thakur, learned counsel representing the bail petitioner that bail petitioner and victim/prosecutrix had prior acquaintance and FIR qua the alleged incident only came to be lodged once father of the victim/prosecutrix saw bail petitioner and victim/prosecutrix in compromising situation.