Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ejaculated in Sanjay Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another on 6 September, 2016Matching Fragments
13. Absence of semen in vaginal swabs and slides of victim and underwear, coronal glan slides and pubic hair of petitioner was not sufficient to negate evidence of 'penetrative sexual assault' by petitioner because offence under Sections 5(m) and 5 (n) was not to be treated as complete only on ejaculation in vagina. Slightest penetration for a shortest time was sufficient to bring the offence under the purview of committing 'penetrative sexual assault' on a child as defined in the Act.