Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Promissory note forgery in A.Thirumoorthy vs S.Bastin on 19 November, 2014Matching Fragments
3. The suit has been resisted by the defendants. Second respondent filed the written statement, which has been adopted by the first defendant. They pleaded complete ignorance about the identity of plaintiff's late wife. Suit promissory note is a rank forgery. It was forged by plaintiff, a fraud and a drug addict. The promissory note is afflicted with material alteration. This is the gist of their case.
4. The trial Court framed the issues. Tried the suit. Plaintiff examined himself as P.W.1 and one Jeyachandran, attestor to Ex.A.1 as P.W.2 and marked Exs.A.1 to 10, while the second defendant examined himself as D.W.1 and no document was marked on their side.