Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

12. Further. this Court haSylll"Obser{ied of its"

judgment in the case of,.Honnqyy:1."Vs';*~.._Staté"of Klxrnataka reported in ILR 2000 Kar 323306 Pariah ' not 0 ' 151" 00 sexual intercourse agal.'n_st" her ..f{:'};e:lpvrolselct1trix is above 16 years. This a'ca"se consent is obtained by putting any oerson in whom she is interested of death"or~ot hurt. This is not a case where 0V'"consent'«is"'ol:tained by reason of unsoundness of irttoiéieation or other reasons explained in A Clause the facts proved also do not fall under Clauses 3 and 4 of Section 375 of IPC. Therefore.