Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ejectment execution in Smt. P.Nagarathnamma vs Sri V. Lakshminarayana on 28 January, 2020Matching Fragments
the defendant here also, thereby I answer Issue no.2 in the affirmative.
11. ISSUE NO.3: The defendant in his written statement contended that, the suit schedule properties are the properties of his wife and later on, his wife has executed a Gift Deed in his favour on 5/1/2015 and the same was registered and as per the said Gift Deed, the defendant is in possession of the suit schedule property and the defendant inducted the plaintiff and her son as the tenants in the month of August 2013 for a monthly rent of Rs.8,000/- and the plaintiff is in arrears of rent, concocted all plaint documents and filed false suit. Already, the defendant had filed the suit in O.S.No.7113/2016 for ejectment which was decreed and the execution proceedings in the E.P.No.2963/2017 is pending for consideration. The contention of the defendant is that, from the judgement passed by the court and also from the documents produced by him, he is the absolute owner 22 CT0028_O.S._7240_2018_Judgment_.doc .