Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Santosh Kumar Pandey's ITD database which had details of his account officer who had already left the company in 2014. As he had updated the detail, immediately within two days, they were approached by ITO Ms. Vandana Sharma and explained about the case of Skylabs Technologies. He had met Ms. Vandana Sharma and submitted his response which was his first submission. That he had not specifically written to them but mentioned in his submissions to guide us to deal with this matter of wrong issuance of second PAN. That the PAN is not issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and Ms. Vandana Sharma was the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. That the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and even the Appellate Authority has no jurisdiction to issue a new PAN/modified PAN or even an order of cancellation/revoking the PAN. That the invoices having the PAN ABVFS4262J were issued by the Accounting Staff of the accused. He voluntarily stated that Sh. Santosh Kumar Pandey is technocrat and has also been dependent on his Accounting and Finance Staff. That none of these invoices were signed by him. That the payment against the said invoices was received in the M/s. Skylabs Technologies.