Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

21) So far as Petition filed by Vijay CHS is concerned, Mr. Raheja would submit that access road to the entire layout from main S.V. Road has been sanctioned by the Planning Authority and mere creation of additional access from 30 meters wide DP Road would not mean that Vijay II CHS would lose right of access from main S.V. Road. That access from main S.V. Road connects all the Buildings in the layout and also grants access to Vijay CHS to recreational ground. He would therefore submit that Petition filed by Vijay CHS is grossly misconceived and liable to be dismissed. Mr. Raheja would accordingly pray for dismissal of both the Petitions.

102) So far as the grant of right of way from main S.V. road is concerned, I find the objection raised by Vijay CHS to be totally misconceived. The layout has an access from main S.V. road on the western side. Towards the back portion on the eastern side, 15% Recreational Ground is maintained. The land connecting main S.V. road with Recreational Ground is kept open which is utilised by all the three buildings for accessing either S.V. road or Recreational Ground. Therefore, even if the Competent Authority was to maintain silence in respect of the road access from main S.V. road in the impugned order, such sanctioned road access in the layout would otherwise remain unaffected and Vijay II CHS would continue to enjoy such road access to main S.V. road. Therefore, I do not find any valid reason to interfere in that portion of the impugned order dated 12 November 2024 which grants benefit of setback area and right of way from main S.V. road to Vijay II CHS. Writ Petition No.4649/2025 filed by Vijay CHS is thus misconceived and liable to be dismissed.