Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Sri P.C. Mehra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 further submits that so for as the matter relates to agreement to sell in respect to the premises in question by Smt. Veena Shukla in favour of opposite parties no. 5 and 6 is concerned has no relevancy because sale-deed dated 30.6.2006 has not been challenged by them before any competent court of law nor they have filed any suit on the basis of agreement to sale till date. Accordingly, the orders passed by two courts below are perfectly valid, writ petition liable to be dismissed as this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot re-appreciate or re-evaluate the evidence on its own motion and set aside the concurrent findings of facts recorded by the courts below.