Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

17. He stated in his cross-examination that LC-Sabina and Rajni had accompanied him from SIU, Chamba. He associated them because Lady constable-Shankuntla was on medical leave. The arrival reports of LC Sabina and Rajni were .

entered at SIU, Chamba. The naka was laid first at Karodi.

Thereafter, the police party went to Behi. The police party left Karodi at 1:00 AM. No vehicle was challaned at Karodi and Behi.

18. HHC-Mohammed Aslam (PW1) supported the prosecution case in his examination-in-chief and made a similar statement as was made by ASI-Govind Pal; therefore, his examination-in-chief is not being reproduced to avoid prolixity and repetition. He stated in his cross-examination that the police .

party proceeded from SIU, Chamba at about 10:30 AM. The report regarding the departure from SIU, Chamba was recorded by ASI Govind Pal. The naka was laid at Karodi at 11:30 am and the police party remained at Karodi till 12:30 PM. He could not tell the distance between Chamba and Karodi. The place Karodi fell before Koti and he could not tell the distance between Karodi and Koti. No naka was laid at Balu, Sarol, Kiani and Pukhari. He did not know which places were mentioned in the departure report as this report was entered by ASI Govind Pal. The police party reached Behi/spot at about 12:45 PM. He did not notice the distance between Behi and Koti. The police party checked 10-15 vehicles at Karodi but did not issue any challan. He did not remember the identification or registration number of any vehicle checked by the police party at Karodi. The police had checked 8-10 vehicles before the arrival of the motorcycle. No challan was issued at Koti. He could not tell the registration number of any vehicle checked by the police party at Koti. He did not know whether the motorcycle of the accused was challaned or not. The accused-Naseer Mohammed could not produce any documents of the vehicle. Tarun Abrol was standing near the spot when the motorcycle was stopped. There were three shops of one .

He denied that the accused Naseer was not driving the motorcycle and he was falsely implicated.

21. PW4 Sunil Kumar also supported the prosecution case in his examination-in-chief and made a similar statement as was made by ASI Govind Pal; therefore, his examination-in-

chief is also not being reproduced. He stated in his cross-

examination that Lady Constables Sabina and Rajni Rana came to SIU, Chamba at about 8:10 a.m. They had not put their signatures on their arrival rapat. They were called because the lady constable of SIU was on leave on that day. He was not aware whether any written communication was sent to LCs Sabina and Rajni Rana. HC-Shokat Ali remained present in the SIU Office after the departure of the police party. No naka was laid at Balu, Sarol, Kiani and Pukhari. 10-12 vehicles were checked at Karodi.

The police party proceeded from SIU, Chamba at about 10:30 am.

ASI Govind Pal directed her to accompany the police party. She volunteered to say that an entry regarding their departure was recorded in SIU, Chamba. She did not receive any telephone from ASI Govind Pal. She did not stop between SIU Chamba and the spot. She corrected to say that a naka was laid at Karodi. She did not know the distance between Karodi and the spot. The police party remained at Karodi from 11:30 am to 12:30 pm. They reached on the spot at about 12:45 pm. They checked 7-8 vehicles .