Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: FUNCTIONING OF DRT in M/S.Universal Shoe Company vs M/S.Canara Bank on 8 March, 2022Matching Fragments
4. The reason assigned for not filing the appeal is stated to be Covid-19 pandemic, without clarifying as to whether the DRT concerned was functional or not in the intervening period. In fact, the DRT concerned was functional during the intervening period so as to challenge the possession notice and now it is time barred. Thus, an indirect way of challenge has been made by filing this writ petition, which is not maintainable in the absence of challenge to the possession notice because e-auction notice is pursuant to the second possession notice. Therefore, the challenge to the e-auction notice cannot be accepted.