Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

petitioner is not only impermissible, but would even amount to judicial impropriety, blatant and scant respect for the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court which otherwise are binding upon this Court under Article 141 of the Constitution of India.

21. It is then vehemently argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case of the petitioner should be ordered to be considered for regularization as in the case of other encroachers as mentioned in Annexure P-11 of the writ petition. This plea has been vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents on the ground that the petitioner is not a similarly situated to those persons. However, without going into that question, it would be noticed that what the petitioner is urging is a plea of negative parity which cannot be claimed or enforced in a Court of law as it is only legal right that can be enforced in a Court of law.