Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

12. In Afcons Infrastructure Limited v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited & Anr.5, this Court held that the owner or the employer of a project, having authored the tender documents, is the best person to un- derstand and appreciate its requirements and interpret its documents. It was held as under:

“13. In other words, a mere disagreement with the decision-mak- ing process or the decision of the administrative authority is no reason for a constitutional court to interfere. The threshold of mala fides, intention to favour someone or arbitrariness, irra- tionality or perversity must be met before the constitutional court interferes with the decision-making process or the deci- sion.