Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: bail in Kalla @ Kalyan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 February, 2015Matching Fragments
Learned Panel Lawyer opposes the bail application on the ground that the applicant is a resident of U.P. State if he is released on bail, he may abscond. It is also submitted by him that if this Court deems it proper to grant him bail, then he be ordered to submit the local surety of the district Datia.
On due consideration of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties by their counsel, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, the application is allowed. It is therefore, ordered that applicant Raj Kumar @ Pappu be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with one local solvent surety of district Datia, in same amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance on all the dates as may be fixed by it in this regard. In case of bail jump, the concerned Court will have power to cancel the applicant's bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties by their counsel and the D.N.A. report, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, the application is allowed. It is therefore, ordered that applicant Prem Singh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty thousand only) with one solvent surety in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance on all the dates as may be fixed by it in this regard. In case of bail jump, the concerned Court will have power to cancel the applicant's bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties by their counsel and the D.N.A., report, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, the application is allowed. It is therefore, ordered that applicant Prem Singh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty thousand only) with one solvent surety in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance on all the dates as may be fixed by it in this regard. In case of bail jump, the concerned Court will have power to cancel the applicant's bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties by their counsel, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail. Hence, the application is allowed. It is therefore, ordered that applicant Sushila Bai be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty thousand only) with one solvent surety in like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for her appearance on all the dates as may be fixed by it in this regard. In case of bail jump, the concerned Court will have power to cancel the applicant's bail.