Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. In brief, complainant/respondent No.2 applied for a residential plot in Parklands (project of BPTP Ltd./respondent No.1) at Faridabad, Haryana in respect of which a complaint was preferred under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi since respondent No.2 was offered a plot of 302 sq. mtrs. instead of 350 sq. mtrs., contrary to agreed terms between the parties. On 10.10.2011, a settlement was entered between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 wherein an alternate plot of 335 sq. yards was proposed in place of earlier plot against payment of Rs.22,23,640/- by respondent No.2/complainant. However, certain further issues cropped regarding identification of plot and maintenance and service agreement due to which the issue remained unsettled and petitioner failed to honour the obligations.

5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. The grievance of the complainant/respondent No.2 relates to allotment of a residential plot at Parklands (project of BPTP Ltd.) at Faridabad, Haryana. The dispute has been settled between the parties in terms of settlement dated 08.03.2024 whereby the petitioners have agreed to pay an amount of Rs.2,35,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore Thirty Five Lacs Only) to respondent No.2, out of which an amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- (One Crore Only) has already been paid to respondent No.2. Balance amount of Rs.1,35,00,000/- (One Crore Thirty Five Lakhs Only) has been paid to respondent No.2 today through DD No.054432 dated 07.03.2024 drawn on IndusInd Bank, NOIDA Branch in favour of respondent No.2, towards full and final settlement between the parties.