Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 91 mcs act in Dr. Waman Kawaduji Hepat, vs Maharashtra Coop. Housing Finance ... on 23 January, 2015Matching Fragments
5. The O.P.No.2 also filed preliminary objection to the effect that the dispute is in between it & its members and hence, the complaint before the Forum is not maintainable vide Sec. 91 of MCS Act. It is also submitted that recovery certificates have been also issued against the complainant by the Asstt. Registrar in case Nos. 527 of 1990-91 and 640 of 1997-98 and therefore, the complaint before the Forum is not maintainable.
6. The Forum below after hearing both the parties and considering evidence brought on record, passed impugned order on 29.07.2002, thereby directed the O.P.No.2 to get audited the account of the complainant from Chartered Accountant (for short CA) as per well established practice of maintenance of account and the amounts deposited by the complainant be adjusted against the arrears and interest be applied and then the accounts statement be provided to the complainant and it will be then responsibility of the complainant to pay the same. The Forum also directed the O.P.No.2 to pay to the complainant compensation of Rs.5,000/- towards mental harassment and cost of Rs.1,000/-.