Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

14. However, what assumes significance is the admitted fact that the 3rd respondent was on deputation to the Matsyafed for two years. The specific stipulation in the Special Rules as to experience is as follows:

"Seven years teaching/Industrial/Administrative Experience under IHRD"

Hence, it is incumbent, for being considered for promotion, that the experience should be under the respondent Organisation itself and not in any other organisation. In such circumstance, the promotion of the 3rd respondent in W.P.(C) No. 26062/2005, in 2004, could not have been made for the reason of he having not satisfied the experience W.P.(C) Nos. 22524 & 26062 of 2005 and W.P.(C) Nos.26 & 34588 of 2006 stipulated. However, this Court has to notice that the 3rd respondent had continued for long, as Principal, and the petitioner also is now promoted as Principal. In such circumstance, there would be no requirement to set aside the promotion of the 3rd respondent. However, necessary modification shall be made in the seniority list of Principal of CAS, with the 3rd respondent given seniority after the date of his acquiring the necessary experience of seven years under IHRD.